Xref: utzoo comp.lang.lisp:3614 comp.lang.scheme:1646
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!expc66
From: expc66@castle.ed.ac.uk (Ulf Dahlen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme
Subject: Re: Virtues of Lisp syntax
Message-ID: <6217@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 9 Sep 90 11:34:17 GMT
References: <3368@skye.ed.ac.uk> <LOU.90Sep6100024@atanasoff.rutgers.edu> <10466@life.ai.mit.edu>
Organization: Edinburgh University Computing Service
Lines: 10

In article <10466@life.ai.mit.edu> rpk@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (Robert Krajewski) writes:
>This is exactly why nobody uses the ``original'' McCarthy Lisp syntax
>anymore.  People threw it out 25 years ago...

What did the ``original'' McCarthy Lisp syntax look like?


--Ulf Dahlen
Linkoping University, Sweden   and   Edinburgh University, Scotland
Internet: uda@ida.liu.se