Xref: utzoo comp.lang.postscript:6087 comp.sys.mac.system:1477
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!mirror!necntc!necssd!harrison
From: harrison@necssd.NEC.COM (Mark Harrison)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Font Pricing
Message-ID: <434@necssd.NEC.COM>
Date: 12 Sep 90 13:16:24 GMT
References: <1990Sep08.111132.10740@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <1990Sep10.130617.11792@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: NEC America Inc. SSD, Irving, TX
Lines: 19

In article <1990Sep10.130617.11792@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>,
mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald) writes:

> We shall simply have to see how well the results come out. It won't
> be hard to beat Postscript, which is only fair on 1200 d.p.i. 
> typesetters and downright ludicrous on 300 d.p.i. printers.

Doug,

What kind of equipment are you used to dealing with?  I hate to seem
like a philistine, but I've always thought Postscript looked
very nice, 300 dpi or whatever.

In other words, what's wrong with PS that it doesn't look very good,
and what will make it better?
-- 
Mark Harrison             harrison@necssd.NEC.COM
(214)518-5050             {necntc, cs.utexas.edu}!necssd!harrison
standard disclaimers apply...