Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!unmvax!bbx!bbxsda!scott
From: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
Newsgroups: comp.music
Subject: Re: Phase "distortion" synthesis
Message-ID: <1053@bbxsda.UUCP>
Date: 7 Sep 90 16:21:17 GMT
References: <2010@aber-cs.UUCP> <2650003@hpsad.HP.COM>
Reply-To: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
Organization: Basis International,  Albuquerque, NM
Lines: 16

In article <2650003@hpsad.HP.COM> smithj@hpsad.HP.COM (Jim Smith) writes:
>Scott Amspoker scott@bbxsda.UUCP mentions that he believes that phase
>distortion synthesis is the same as FM.

For the record, I did not exactly say that.  I have no knowledge of "phase
distortion" and would not make such a statement.  Another poster attempted
to describe phase distortion and I pointed out that what he wrote 
sounded just like FM.  Later, another net reader explained to me, in
private email, that phase distortion is basically a subset or limited
form of FM.

-- 
Scott Amspoker
Basis International, Albuquerque, NM
(505) 345-5232
unmvax.cs.unm.edu!bbx!bbxsda!scott