Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!emory!mephisto!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun9.astro.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
From: gl8f@astsun9.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Publications (was Re: Musing on Constitutionality)
Message-ID: <1990Sep7.172613.6249@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 7 Sep 90 17:26:13 GMT
References: <11608@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <55@hyprion.ddmi.com> <11622@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Lines: 12

In article <11622@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> spaf@cs.purdue.edu (Gene Spafford) writes:

>but I also am against the contention that 1st amendment provides any
>immunity from fraud prosecutions, or lawsuits for libel.

I haven't seen anyone say that the 1st amendment provides this
immunity. Perhaps we're all on utterly different wavelengths. Let's
not argue about straw men when there are plenty of interesting issues.

--
"Perhaps I'm commenting a bit cynically, but I think I'm qualified to."
                                              - Dan Bernstein