Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
From: gl8f@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Evidence (was Re: Musing on Constitutionality)
Message-ID: <1990Sep13.053240.985@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 13 Sep 90 05:32:40 GMT
References: <36981@ut-emx> <3998@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM> <JMC.90Sep12150942@Gang-of-Four.usenet>
Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Lines: 15

In article <JMC.90Sep12150942@Gang-of-Four.usenet> jmc@Gang-of-Four.usenet (John McCarthy) writes:
>As far as I can see, no-one actually answered Gene Spafford's question
>about whether the law sees a difference between the New York Times
>and a basement produced sheet.

Spaf only asked because he seemed to think that someone said it was ok
to print nasty stuff (credit card #'s, libel, slander) if you were
part of the "press".

Nobody claimed that. Like many discussions on Usenet, this one isn't
going anywhere fast.

--
"Perhaps I'm commenting a bit cynically, but I think I'm qualified to."
                                              - Dan Bernstein