Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!snorkelwacker!usc!wuarchive!uunet!motcid!koch
From: koch@motcid.UUCP (Clifton Koch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: Procomm Versus Qmodem
Message-ID: <4606@navy22.UUCP>
Date: 11 Sep 90 15:01:06 GMT
References: <4cba5835.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Heights, IL
Lines: 10

From article <4cba5835.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>, by esteban@apollo.HP.COM:
> Would anybody care to compare PCPLUS to Qmodem?  I just played around with
> Qmodem and was very impressed.   Should I switch?

  I switched from PCPLUS to Qmodem because PCPLUS was having trouble keeping
up with my HST modem on high speed file transfers.  PCPLUS would occasionally
lock up, but Qmodem would work great (I see a > 1700 cps transfer rate with
binary files and compression turned off).  The terminal emulation on Qmodem
seems a bit shakey, though.  It doesn't get along with our Sun system at
work real well.