Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!richard From: richard@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) Newsgroups: uk.misc,eunet.followup,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Internet routing Europe - USA -} Europe... Message-ID: <3390@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 10 Sep 90 12:05:06 GMT References: <1990Aug30.091435.1982@ircam.ircam.fr> <6190@vanuata.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> <4847@tardis.cs.ed.ac.uk> <3384@skye.ed.ac.uk> <1990Sep7.204240.9205@chx400.switch.ch> Reply-To: richard@aiai.UUCP (Richard Tobin) Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 12 >>In terms of bits per second, Janet (and ISO) might win over TCP. But >Do you have any hard data that supports this? Certainly not. I have no idea whether it's true. The point I was trying to make was that *even if* it's true, I'd be better off with TCP. -- Richard -- Richard Tobin, JANET: R.Tobin@uk.ac.ed AI Applications Institute, ARPA: R.Tobin%uk.ac.ed@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk Edinburgh University. UUCP: ...!ukc!ed.ac.uk!R.Tobin