Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!warwick!cudep
From: cudep@warwick.ac.uk (Ian Dickinson)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,eunet.followup,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Internet routing Europe - USA -} Europe...
Message-ID: <1990Sep11.095625.22364@warwick.ac.uk>
Date: 11 Sep 90 09:56:25 GMT
References: <LMJM.90Sep3171440@oriona.doc.ic.ac.uk> <4847@tardis.cs.ed.ac.uk> <3384@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: news@warwick.ac.uk (Network news)
Organization: Team Limpid's Death Mollusc From Hell - The Good Old Boys
Lines: 17

In article <3384@skye.ed.ac.uk> richard@aiai.UUCP (Richard Tobin) writes:
>In terms of bits per second, Janet (and ISO) might win over TCP.  But
>in terms of who's been able to use interactive ftp, I think it's clear
>which has been more efficient over the last ten years.  The supporters
>of this "efficiency" view have wasted hundreds of hours of my time.

There's an interactive ftam with isode, including ftam-ftp converters
for both directions (internet ftp btw.)  Just because CB doesn't have it,
doesn't mean that OSI won't.  All we need now is a fast implementation
or a good excuse to just use IP.  1/2 :-)

Cheers,
--
\/ato.  Ian Dickinson.    GNU's not got BSE.      Cut Cerebus some slack!
vato@cu.warwick.ac.uk          Plinth.          
vato@tardis.cs.ed.ac.uk        Sabeq.         
gdd046@cck.cov.ac.uk                          "Nuke me tender, nuke me good!"