Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!pacbell.com!pacbell!att!mcdchg!mcdphx!citek.mcdphx.mot.com!hbg6
From: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
Newsgroups: comp.robotics
Subject: Re:High Accuracy manipulators
Message-ID: <13566@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Date: 8 Sep 90 03:51:34 GMT
Sender: listen@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com
Reply-To: hbg6@citek.mcdphx.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az.
Lines: 16
Summary:
Expires:
References:<J?=%^5|@ads.com> <1990Aug28.234809.15660@portia.Stanford.EDU> <1990Aug30.014817.8794@portia.Stanford.EDU> <141582@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <5829@hplabsb.HP.COM> <29067@netnews.upenn.edu> <5832@hplabsb.HP.COM> <1990Sep6.202839.15676@cs.utk.edu> <5837@hplabsb.HP.COM>
Sender:
Followup-To:
Distribution:

In article <5837@hplabsb.HP.COM> mgsmith@hplabsb.UUCP (Michael Smith) writes:
>
>We have to get away from what people can do and have robots do  what we cannot 
>(such as high accuracy assembly).  Such projects not being considered
>as interesting is something we need to overcome.
>
>Mike Smith
>HP Labs

Not considered interesting by whom? The popular press is still waiting
for the 100% accurate robotic lawn mower / window washer. A robotic
system which places a spindle in an interference fit hole just dosen't
make points in the ratings. If your playing to that audience, don't
hold your breath for interest.

John