Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au!wehi!baxter_a
From: BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: C= screws customers again!
Message-ID: <12448@wehi.dn.mu.oz>
Date: 7 Sep 90 16:25:46 GMT
References: <3986@crash.cts.com| <1990Aug31.182655.1029@digibd> <2911@corpane.UUCP> <29644@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Organization: Walter & Eliza Hall Institute
Lines: 22

In article <29644@nigel.ee.udel.edu>, new@ee.udel.edu (Darren New) writes:
>>|I guess I'm raising two questions:  Would there be more GOOD local
>>|dealers if they didn't have to compete with mail order?  
> 
> How about this:
> 
>   "Authorized dealers may sell mailorder to any customer whose zipcode
>    does not match the zipcode of another authorized dealer."
> 
> Or some such.            -- Darren


I don't like that at all. Our local authorized dealer is a criminal. How
about:

"Authorization indicates that we believe a dealer is reputable. If you find
this not to be the case, please contact us immediately, and we will boil
them in sump oil. You may buy whatever you like by any method you like from
any authorized dealer you like, and we promise not to inconvenience the
customer at all, only crooked dealers."

Regards Alan