Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!mmdf
From: thamilton@ch3.intel.com (Tony Hamilton, WF1-81, x48142)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: motorola/intel
Message-ID: <30140@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Date: 11 Sep 90 19:38:40 GMT
Sender: mmdf@ee.udel.edu
Lines: 14

To whoever posted the idea that Intel chips just don't compare to Motorola's,
I can not agree more.  They DON'T compare, because they follow two entirely
different principles.  Motorola utilizes memory-mapping, while Intel uses
Isolated I/O.  Each has various advantages and downfalls.  When saying they
don't compare, I surely hope you infer that they are nothing alike, and not
that one is better than the other.  The unfortunate thing is that most users
can only see the advantages of memory-mapping, while Intel chips are
appreciated most in the high end of the market.
 
Defending Intel interests across the globe...
 
                    Tony Hamilton
 
                 THamilton@ch3.intel.com