Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!umich!bushido!donb From: donb@bushido.uucp (Donald Burnett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: New toaster Message-ID: <1990Sep11.205400.1680@bushido.uucp> Date: 11 Sep 90 20:54:00 GMT References: <1990Sep11.033542.1886@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <54331@masscomp.ccur.com> Distribution: na Organization: Bushido Systems of Ann Arbor, Michigan. Lines: 39 In article <54331@masscomp.ccur.com> mark@calvin.westford.ccur.com (Mark Thompson) writes: >In article <1990Sep11.033542.1886@zip.eecs.umich.edu> gilgalad@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Ralph Seguin) writes: >>I read a posting a bit back concerning the Toaster. Apparently >>somebody was rendering at a resolution of 1500x900 on it. Is >>this true? Is there going to be a different toaster for higher >>resolutions? > >The current incarnation of LightWave 3D (the renderer for the Toaster) >renders to three resolutions. The normal resolution is that of the Toaster >which is 768x484. There is also a low-res output and what is termed an >antialias-res output. In antialias mode, the images are rendered to >roughly 1500x900 and then filtered down to Toaster resolution. There >is no current capability to render to resolutions greater than the Toaster's >768x484. When I last spoke to Allen Hastings and asked him why no higher >resolution output, he replied that it was strictly a video product therefore >the higher resolutions are unecessary. I hope this changes. Given sufficient >memory, I would like to take my video animations and output selected >hi-res stills for use with an image recorder (say around 2K x 2K). > >Disclaimer: I ain't no NewTek employee! >+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ >| Mark Thompson | >| mark@westford.ccur.com | >| ...!{decvax,uunet}!masscomp!mark Designing high performance graphics | >| (508)392-2480 engines today for a better tomorrow. | >+------------------------------------------------------------------------- + It was my understanding that the toaster actually didn't use PIXEL ratings for it's resolution. I thought it worked just with "scanlines", or at least that's what one of the newtek employees was saying at AmiExpo this summer. -- **************************************************************** ********* donb@bushido.uucp ****** ********* "My Opinions are my own, not anyone else's ****** ********* Organizational Affiliations ****** ********* CreativEdge Systems, the Multimedia Solution ****** ********* The Computer Shoppe, Ypsilanti-Ann Arbor, MI's ****** ********* Commodore-Amiga Education Dealer ******