Xref: utzoo comp.sys.dec:3945 comp.windows.x:26621
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!emory!utkcs2!de5
From: de5@de5.CTD.ORNL.GOV (Dave Sill)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.windows.x
Subject: Tradeoffs between DEC & MIT servers
Message-ID: <1990Sep6.133417.10252@cs.utk.edu>
Date: 6 Sep 90 13:34:17 GMT
Sender: news@cs.utk.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: Dave Sill <de5@ornl.gov>
Organization: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Lines: 11

What are the tradeoffs between the DEC UWS server and the MIT R4
server?  I'm considerring switching from the DEC to the MIT because I
want R4 features and don't like DEC's nonstandard font mechanism.  I
realize I'd be loosing Display PostScript--not a big deal to me at
this point--but what about performance?  Are there any other
differences?  Is this a good idea?

-- 
Dave Sill (de5@ornl.gov)
Martin Marietta Energy Systems
Workstation Support