Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!pacbell.com!decwrl!bacchus.pa.dec.com!shlump.nac.dec.com!riscy.enet.dec.com!fuel.dec.com!graham
From: graham@fuel.dec.com (kris graham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: Tradeoffs between DEC & MIT servers
Keywords: MIT, DEC, server
Message-ID: <1728@riscy.enet.dec.com>
Date: 11 Sep 90 00:04:02 GMT
References: <6524@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM> <1990Sep6.133417.10252@cs.utk.edu>
Sender: newsdaemon@riscy.enet.dec.com
Organization: Mind Terrorists, New York City
Lines: 18



> I've used both, although I haven't used the DEC windows server extensively,
> and the MIT server/clients are far faster.  

Do you have any data for us to look at?

>Also you get more choices for window managers and other goodies.

I am trying hard to see the relationship between the above and the
base  question...ie...server performance comparisons.  Many
(including me) have tested several MIT clients against Digital
servers, and they work pretty well.   I don't get your point.....
help me out.

Christopher Graham
Internet: graham@fuel.enet.dec.com 
UUCP:     ...!decwrl!fuel.enet.dec.com!graham