Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!usc!pollux.usc.edu!kurtzman
From: kurtzman@pollux.usc.edu (Stephen Kurtzman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: FullWrite vs. Nisus
Message-ID: <27092@usc.edu>
Date: 12 Sep 90 20:44:10 GMT
References: <#3725@cup.portal.com> <26EC4D26.18071@ics.uci.edu>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 23
Nntp-Posting-Host: pollux.usc.edu

In article <26EC4D26.18071@ics.uci.edu> pazzani@ics.uci.edu (Michael Pazzani) writes:

>I'm also envious that none of grammar checkers that I know of seem to
>work with Fullwrite.  

No great loss here. I've heard that the none of the grammar checkers
work well. That has certainly been my experience with Grammatik Mac.


>Has anyone used 2.0 long enough to find out if it stable or quicker?

Are you referring to version 1.5, perhaps? It is hard to tell what
the advantages are to using 1.5 versus 1.1. The only new feature of
any consequence is that certain types of sidebars can now be dragged into
position. They didn't send a list of bug fixes with the upgrade. It's
my guess that the list would be embarrassingly long and embarrassingly
incomplete.

-- 
-----
Stephen Kurtzman             | "where desire writhed there stands a stone
kurtzman@pollux.usc.edu      |  the change was sudden and complete"
                             |                              -- Maggie Roche