Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!ingr!infonode!lowersbp From: lowersbp@infonode.ingr.com (Ben P Lowers) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard Subject: Re: PC HyperCard clones Message-ID: <1990Sep12.143927.7489@infonode.ingr.com> Date: 12 Sep 90 14:39:27 GMT Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL Lines: 37 I have used PLUS on the Macintosh for a couple of months. It IS essentially HyperCard 1.2.5 plus some stuff, minus some speed. We specifically needed it for putting gray scales in the card window so that we could put buttons on top of them... It has a funny tool pallette/message box thingamujig, but it does offer all kinds of styled fields and graphics objects like polygons. And it beats the pants off of SuperCard with regards to stack development turnaround time. Also, there are a lot of authoring-related things that you CAN'T do in SuperCard, that you CAN do in PLUS, and even HyperCard, such as choose the brush tool domenu "Paste" (some PICT or paint graphic was on the Clipboard) choose the browse tool I couldn't do that in SuperCard. But with PLUS, if the Clipboard has a color or gray scale PICT in it - BOOM! You've got an awesome card window, all done for the user at the scripting level. I have also seen a Beta of PLUS for Windows 3.0. It is essentially the Mac version ON A PC. I saw it on a 16MHz XT, and it didn't fly, It was a bit slower than Hypercard 1.0 on a Macintosh Plus. But the key is, it brings just about ALL of that capibility to the PC! But NO XCMDs and NO XFCNs. Maybe the announced Slot Developer's Toolkit will solve all of the problems with externals. It doesn't sound near as bad as the reports we getting about how BAD ToolBook is. For you own Beta, you can apply with: Spinnaker Software Cambridge, MA (617) 494-1200 Good luck, and anyway, running HyperCard 2.0 or PLUS on a Macintosh is a lot less grief... -- Ben Lowers | Intergraph Corp. lowersbp@ingr.com or | Huntsville,AL 35894-0001 uunet!ingr!b23b!big!ben | (205) 730-8599