Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pequod.cso.uiuc.edu!dorner
From: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: file format for distributing technical documentation
Message-ID: <1990Sep7.184444.13781@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 7 Sep 90 18:44:44 GMT
References: <24096@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Reply-To: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 10

In article <24096@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> ari@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Ari Halberstadt) writes:
>As you can see, Microsoft Word 3.0 is in first place, with not a
>single "No" or "Maybe" vote.

If I'd have known you were taking votes, you sure would have gotten at least
one "no" vote on Microsoft Word.  Up til a month ago, I didn't have
ANYTHING that would read such a document.
--
Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office
Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu  UUCP: uunet!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!s-dorner