Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!occrsh!uokmax!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!crowl From: crowl@cs.rochester.edu (Lawrence Crowl) Newsgroups: comp.text.sgml Subject: Is there a DTD standard? Message-ID: <1990Sep12.020242.2916@cs.rochester.edu> Date: 12 Sep 90 02:02:42 GMT References: <141829@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> > <8027@mcshh.hanse.de> <1990Sep11.163347.7593@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <1990Sep11.193327.19935@terminator.cc.umich.edu> Reply-To: crowl@cs.rochester.edu (Lawrence Crowl) Organization: University of Rochester Computer Science Dept Lines: 27 In article <1990Sep11.193327.19935@terminator.cc.umich.edu> jwh@ifs.umich.edu writes: >A "DTD" is a Document Type Definition. It is used to spell out rules which >govern the markup used in a document. SGML itself does not specify or define >any specific markup elements (such as chapter, paragraph, title, etc.) It >really specifies a meta-language for defining markup languages. A DTD will >specify (among other things) what markup "tags" are legal and where tags can >occur. The idea of SGML as a meta-language for defining document syntax is a good idea. However, most of the time, I'm just writing text. Does there exist a standard for a DTD that says what tags to use in book/articles? For instance, should I use or or what? How should I describe bulleted lists? >The parser would use the DTD to analyze the document for violations of the >DTD rules and possibly some other work such as translating the document into >a series of typesetting commands. But typesetting the document requires that one know what and mean. The SGML standard doesn't say what they mean. Does anyone know of work in this area? Surely the book and journal publishers have an opinion on what should be done. -- Lawrence Crowl 716-275-9499 University of Rochester crowl@cs.rochester.edu Computer Science Department ...!{ames,rutgers}!rochester!crowl Rochester, New York, 14627