Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!ruuinf!piet
From: dhosek@sif.claremont.edu (Hosek, Donald A.)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: LaTeX 2.10/3.0
Keywords: LaTeX, Mittlebach, Schoepf
Message-ID: <8291@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: 6 Sep 90 23:11:49 GMT
References: <1990Sep3.010417.21701@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: news@jarthur.Claremont.EDU
Reply-To: dhosek@sif.claremont.edu
Organization: Harvey Mudd College
Lines: 27

In article <3746@ruuinf.cs.ruu.nl>, piet@cs.ruu.nl (Piet van Oostrum) writes...
>In article <1990Sep3.010417.21701@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>, dmjones@theory (David M. Jones) writes:
> |2. What problems can I expect with the version of LaTeX I've described
> |above?  
>The new scheme does not work with old LASY font files. You have to get the
>new ones. (the symbols like \unlhd are in the new fonts, whereas in the old
>LaTeX they were built from other symbols).

Huh?

Umm, what lasy font files are you using that don't work with the
new font selection stuff? Actually, this plus some other symptoms
you described seemed to indicate that you might have been using
an older version of the fontsel macros (check fontsel.readme in
[anonymous.tex.inputs.latex-mainz] on ymir.claremont.edu for
release dates). I have been toying with making a hybrid of
oldlfont.sty that uses AMS fonts, but not until I have boldface
versions.

-dh

---
Don Hosek                       TeX, LaTeX, and Metafont support, consulting 
dhosek@ymir.claremont.edu       installation and production work. 
dhosek@ymir.bitnet              Free Estimates.
uunet!jarthur!ymir              Phone: 714-625-0147
                                finger dhosek@ymir.claremont.edu for more info