Xref: utzoo news.groups:23566 comp.unix.internals:152 comp.unix.programmer:6
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Why don't we just gateway u-w to unix.programmer?
Message-ID: <7489:Sep901:11:2390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 9 Sep 90 01:11:23 GMT
References: <18533@rpp386.cactus.org> <1053@lot.ACA.MCC.COM> <26E7C052.73E@tct.uucp>
Organization: IR
Lines: 13
X-Original-Subject: Re: c.u.wizards vs. c.u.internals

A very simple solution to this entire issue: Gateway the unix-wizards
mailing list to comp.unix.programmer rather than to comp.unix.internals.
This solves the problem for the source license people, better reflects
the contents of the list, and doesn't require any work outside the list
gateway.

> If anyone objects strongly to a bending of the guidelines here, please
> let yourself be heard.  I don't want this group's propagation to be
> fragmented because of administrator resentment.  I'm listening.

There's enough resentment already. Don't make it a USENET problem.

---Dan