Xref: utzoo news.admin:10597 comp.unix.internals:235
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!mindcrf.UUCP!karish
From: karish@mindcrf.UUCP (Chuck Karish)
Newsgroups: news.admin,comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: About the comp.unix.internals fluster
Message-ID: <9009122244.AA06635@mindcrf.mindcraft.com>
Date: 12 Sep 90 22:44:41 GMT
References: <15489@drilex.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Mindcraft, Inc.
Lines: 15

In article <15489@drilex.UUCP> dricejb@drilex.UUCP
(Craig Jackson drilex1) writes:
>If anyone is really concerned about the legalities of these things,
>then there should be no 'comp.unix.xxx' groups.  They should all
>be 'comp.unix.operating.system.xxx'.

'comp.unix-operating-system.xxx', if you please.  We don't need
a three-level directory hierarchy to satisfy AT&T's lawyers.
Of course, the trademark owners have, in their infinite wisdom,
limited directory names in their versions of the UNIX operating system
to 14 letters, so 'comp.unix.xxx' is more appropriate.
-- 

	Chuck Karish		karish@mindcraft.com
	Mindcraft, Inc.		(415) 323-9000