Xref: utzoo news.groups:23582 comp.unix.internals:161 comp.unix.programmer:11 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ogicse!husc6!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.programmer Subject: Re: Why don't we just gateway u-w to unix.programmer? Message-ID: <10924:Sep910:09:1490@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Date: 9 Sep 90 10:09:14 GMT Article-I.D.: kramden.10924:Sep910:09:1490 References: <26E7C052.73E@tct.uucp> <7489:Sep901:11:2390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1990Sep9.051053.2696@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Organization: IR Lines: 44 In article <1990Sep9.051053.2696@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gl8f@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes: > In article <7489:Sep901:11:2390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: > >A very simple solution to this entire issue: Gateway the unix-wizards > >mailing list to comp.unix.programmer rather than to comp.unix.internals. > Why? > Do wizards talk only about programming? No. > Do wizards talk only about internals? No. That's irrelevant. As you would be able to verify if you archived (or read) these groups, almost all of the threads in unix-wizards are very accurately described by ``UNIX programming discussions.'' Hence unix-wizards is most appropriately gatewayed into comp.unix.programmer. This also solves the possible problem of UNIX source licenses keeping people away from unix-wizards just because they can't talk about UNIX internals. > It seems that the original proposal didn't rename comp.unix.wizards, > it destroyed it. The group wasn't ``destroyed'' by anything but the explosion of USENET. It's no longer the corner of the net where wizards hold a private party, with awestruck outsiders peering in for a glimpse of greatness. For years now it's been just another newsgroup. Moderating it might bring back the original but would destroy the different group that now exists. > I've recommended to Eric Fair that he keep the inet > group comp.unix.wizards, and make it self-moderated like alt.hackers > to keep the noise down. Sure, it would be nice for wizards to have a place to hang out and chat without the restrictions of e-mail. (Why do you care?) Unfortunately, a newsgroup that functioned the way u-w was meant to would be a ``magnet group'' and would have to be moderated; changing comp.unix.wizards into such a moderated group would eliminate the open forum that a lot of people now consider a valuable resource. Step 1 is to be realistic and gateway the mailing list into the most appopriate newsgroup, hence solving the problems that started this thread. Step 2 is to make a wizards group like u-w used to be. I don't know the best way to do this; let's get step 1 done first. ---Dan