Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!apple!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!bmc.uu.se!kuling!jand
From: jand@kuling.UUCP (Jan Dj{rv)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: sh vs. sh5 in ultrix
Message-ID: <1649@kuling.UUCP>
Date: 5 Sep 90 08:22:29 GMT
References: <3865@umbc3.UMBC.EDU> <MEISSNER.90Sep3231422@osf.osf.org> <1990Sep4.063729.27822@wrl.dec.com>
Reply-To: jand@kuling.UUCP (Jan Dj{rv)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University, Sweden
Lines: 16

In article <1990Sep4.063729.27822@wrl.dec.com> vixie@wrl.dec.com (Paul Vixie) writes:
#In article <MEISSNER.90Sep3231422@osf.osf.org>,
#meissner@osf.org (Michael Meissner) writes...
## I happen to think that System V integration was real low priority on
## Ultrix.  All you have to do is look at how they botched curses
## (requiring you to change the source to include cursesX.h instead of
## curses.h).  Sun did a much better job of mixing the two.
#
#As far as that goes, HP did an even better job than Sun.  And Pyramid
#did a better job that ANYBODY.  But why does anybody care about System V?
#

Well, HP actually started with System V and mixed in BSD...


	Jan D.