Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!dptg!ulysses!andante!mit-eddie!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!CHRIS_LAVENDER_WADE
From: CHRIS_LAVENDER_WADE@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Actor and Smalltalk for win 3.0
Message-ID: <33720@cup.portal.com>
Date: 10 Sep 90 04:32:07 GMT
References: <14099@rouge.usl.edu>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 5

In my experience, Digitalk's Smalltalk is significantly faster than Actor.
Digitalk will ship Smalltalk Windows in December (I am told). It is very
similar to Smalltalk V/PM which is very good. For performance sensitive
parts of your code, you can use DLLs. Code development should take 25-50%
of the time you will spend on C.