Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!decwrl!shelby!helens!hanauma!bonnie
From: bonnie@hanauma.stanford.edu (Bonnie Rippere)
Newsgroups: rec.birds
Subject: Re: INDOOR vs. OUTDOOR:Please read(was Re: Aspiration in birds)
Message-ID: <867@helens.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 4 Aug 90 01:20:41 GMT
References: <37352@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <GRP.90Jul30091525@magpie.unify.uucp> <1990Aug1.171049.29466@dinorah.wustl.edu> <3055@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <1990Aug1.200400.3633@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Sender: news@helens.Stanford.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Stanford University, Department of Geophysics
Lines: 15

In article <1990Aug1.200400.3633@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> plemmons@brain.mth.msu.edu (Steve Plemmons) writes:
>In article <3055@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> geek@media-lab.media.mit.edu (Chris Schmandt) writes:
>>Sure seems that its about time to split this group.  Traffic is high
>
>Traffic?  The traffic in this group is light compared to most groups I
>read.  A few times this summer there were days at a time when nobody
>posted at all.  Is hitting the "k" key through 15-25 articles a day that
>tiresome to you.  Come on people, this group is IMHO just fine.

I totally agree with Steve.  I actually enjoy reading both the bird-watching
and the pet bird tales - being as how I love watching outdoor birds, as
well as my cockatiel.  Having it split would mean the same amount of 
reading for me, just more lines in my news file.

Bonnie