Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!paul.rutgers.edu!dcohen From: dcohen@paul.rutgers.edu (Dawn Myfanwy Cohen) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Help w/stupid genetics report Message-ID: Date: 10 Sep 90 16:16:41 GMT References: <8773@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 26 michael busch writes: > So, in an effort to save myself some embarassment, I turn to you, the > net-world for help. If you would just take 3 minutes of your precious > time and mail a response to me with either the word 'attached' or > 'unattahed' (for earlobes) it would make my life easier. Then I can > just lump all of the statistics together and do my report. Let's hope there is no stigma attached (no pun intended) to having either 'attached' or 'unattached' earlobes. Imagine if only the 'attached' netters responded. Michael, please post your final statistics, as well as statistics for the overall population, if possible. It might be interesting to see if people who work on computers are more or less likely to have attached than the general public. :-) -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Good Morning! --Dawn Send fan mail to: uucp: {ames,bosgd,harvard,moss}!rutgers!paul.rutgers.edu!dcohen arpa: dcohen@paul.rutgers.edu