Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: schoff@uu.psi.com (Martin Schoffstall)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Info Needed on COLAN
Message-ID: <12149@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 13 Sep 90 13:36:52 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: Martin Schoffstall <schoff@uu.psi.com>
Organization: Performance Systems International, Inc.
Lines: 12
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 645, Message 10 of 11


Intecom at one point in time was also marketing this capability on
their PBX, as I remember there was a bandwidth limit <10Mbps on the
cable plant to the phone.  In addition an Ethernet Jam et al was
propogated to each "phone".  In general a real mess, this was circa
1986.

I'd be interested in hearing on some of the technical details of the
DAVID systems on the list.


Marty