Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!cadence!baeder
From: baeder@shamu.cadence.com (D. Scott Baeder; x299)
Newsgroups: comp.lsi.cad
Subject: Re: Request for place-and-route netlist
Message-ID: <1990Sep13.135745.772@cadence.com>
Date: 13 Sep 90 13:57:45 GMT
References: <MASS.90Sep11113430@garfield.usa>
Sender: usenet@cadence.com (USENET News)
Reply-To: baeder@cadence.com
Distribution: comp.lsi.cad
Organization: Cadence ACAE Division
Lines: 17


In article <MASS.90Sep11113430@garfield.usa>, mass@garfield.usa (Mass
Sivilotti) writes:
|> I am looking for a benchmark for evaluating 
|> place-and-route software.  Any suggestions
|> are welcome, but I am especially interested
|> in something called "Deutsch's (sp?) difficult example".
|> Does anybody have this (preferably in machine-readable
|> form)?

Don't know if Dave's Difficult channel is in there, but there is a
whole "Suite" of P&R benchmarks that are managed by MCNC. (they were
used at various P&R workshops sponsored by mcnc and SIGDA)...

Try contacting them..

scott.