Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!umigw!mthvax!aem From: aem@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (a.e.mossberg) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: Sendmail 5.64 IDA 1.3.4 / DEC mail11v3 problem Message-ID: <1990Sep17.031234.16952@mthvax.cs.miami.edu> Date: 17 Sep 90 03:12:34 GMT References: <1990Sep13.021422.22907@comp.vuw.ac.nz> <1990Sep14.014457.9171@mthvax.cs.miami.edu> <1990Sep16.073000.5999@wrl.dec.com> Reply-To: aem@Mthvax.CS.Miami.Edu Organization: University of Miami Department of Mathematics & Computer Science Lines: 22 In <1990Sep16.073000.5999@wrl.dec.com> vixie@wrl.dec.com (Paul Vixie) writes: >That's news to me. I use this stuff to reach DEC's many tens of thousands >of VMS machines, and it seems to work pretty smoothly. If there's a problem, >I'd love to have more information about it. Sending mail from VMS hosts worked, although significantly more slowly than with mail11dv3. Mail to/from ULTRIX/DECnet hosts worked without any problems. Mail to VMS hosts failed. I didn't keep the binaries here, but you've told me in private mail that you use this version without any problems and without the DNUMODS I tried to integrate into 5.64 The only problem left with 5.64 on ULTRIX is the DEC's lack of ndbm, and none of the ndbm-clones I've tried being a drop-in replacement. sdbm was tried with marginal success, and gdbm or dbz might be doable with a little work. aem -- a.e.mossberg / aem@mthvax.cs.miami.edu / aem@umiami.BITNET / Pahayokee Bioregion Amo--ergo sum. (I love, therefore I am.) - Alma Mahler Werfel