Xref: utzoo comp.mail.uucp:5183 news.groups:23767 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stl!robobar!ronald From: ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,news.groups Subject: MMDF group anyone ? (WAS Re: Problems with MMDF and UUCP mail) Message-ID: <1990Sep14.045728.3527@robobar.co.uk> Date: 14 Sep 90 04:57:28 GMT References: <7921@gollum.twg.com> <1990Sep12.122549.21039@robobar.co.uk> Followup-To: news.groups Organization: Robobar Ltd., Perivale, Middx., ENGLAND. Lines: 21 In article emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) writes: [ I wrote ] >> Is there >> a hysterical reason why MMDF *isn't* discussed on USENET ? Where would >> be a good place to ask questions about it ? (I have a few burning ones :-) > Suggest that you agitate for a while, do a call for discussion, then a > call for votes. In 2 months time you'll have a group. Not much good if the MMDF gurus don't like it out here in the USENET and I really haven't seen anyone other than David Herron out here. Steve Kille has never been a big USENET fan and anyway he's probably bored with MMDF now, and busily preparing for the PP launch. *BUT* if there's any MMDF people out there in the woodwork who'd like to see such a group, speak up! If you're there, it might even be worth putting out a call for discussion. Are you there anyone ? (yes David, I know *you* are :-) -- my .signature is on holiday