Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uc!cs.umn.edu!cybrspc!roy From: roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps Subject: Re: Procomm Versus Qmodem Keywords: Qmodem,Procomm Message-ID: Date: 13 Sep 90 18:48:27 GMT References: <1990Sep12.002738.1531@chinet.chi.il.us> Organization: Villa CyberSpace, Minneapolis, MN Lines: 21 wmf@chinet.chi.il.us (Bill Fischer) writes: > Boy, this posting has the potential of starting "comm wars". (that clicking sound you hear..... :-) > I have used Qmodem SST and found it to be a very friendly program with lots > of fun bells and whistles. However, the VT100 emulation was pretty poor. My best results for VT100 came from Boyan. I stayed away from Qmodem because of the size of the program. (back when all I had was 10 megs, size was an important consideration) > Since most of the systems I log into are *NIX, this is a pretty major draw- > back. Precisely why I was using Boyan... the emulation is very solid. -- Roy M. Silvernail |+| roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu |+| #define opinions ALL_MINE; main(){float x=1;x=x/50;printf("It's only $%.2f, but it's my $%.2f!\n",x,x);} "This is cyberspace." -- Peter da Silva :--: "...and I like it here!" -- me