Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:5420 comp.os.os2.misc:227 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!pasteur!baobab.berkeley.edu!twagner From: twagner@baobab.berkeley.edu (Tim Wagner) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: Query: Which would you recommend? Windows? or OS2 w/ PM? Message-ID: <27980@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 19 Sep 90 18:28:05 GMT References: <4227@rex.cs.tulane.edu> Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: twagner@baobab.berkeley.edu (Tim Wagner) Lines: 40 John Keating writes:In article <4227@rex.cs.tulane.edu>, keating@rex.cs.tulane.edu (John W. Keating) writes: |> Here's a question for the net: |> |> I was looking through some magazines lately and came up with these (rounded, |> from memory) figures: |> |> OS2 SE/PM: $295 Windows: $129 |> MS-DOS: $ 65 |> ---- ---- |> $295 $194 |> |> A difference of only $101. For an operating system that leaps as far ahead |> of MSDOS as OS2 does, and for a better integrated GUI, that seems an awful |> small price to pay. |> |> This brings up a few questions in my mind. Why would anyone buy Windows |> when such a better alternative is available for a comparative price? |> |> Also, why doesn't Microsoft try to push OS2 more? I can see how they would |> be afraid to at this time, considering how Windows 3.0 has taken off, but |> why didn't they before? And will they in the future? |> |> Disclaimer: I have used both OS2 and Windows 3.0, and they are both (in my |> eyes) good products. I am not Windows bashing here. People I have spoken to suspect that MS is waiting for version 2.0, and possibly another hardware base before really marketing OS/2 with a vengeance. The 1.x versions thus playing a sort of "extended beta-test" role in their mind (though probably not in IBM's). Also, they seem to have an evolutionary goal for current DOS/Windows users, rather than a throw-away strategy. Speaking of which, net-readers, does anyone know whether 2.0 has been officially announced/released? Tim Wagner UC Berkeley twagner@sequoia.Berkeley.EDU Programming Environments Research Group * Standard Disclaimers apply to this posting