Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!abvax!iccgcc!klimas
From: klimas@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 APIsDOWNDOWN
Message-ID: <1011.26f731e9@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
Date: 19 Sep 90 13:52:57 GMT
References: <1990Sep4.130929.16442@sun1.ruf.uni-freiburg.de> <4274@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> <20157@well.sf.ca.us> <807.26e7aa93@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> <20180@well.sf.ca.us>
Distribution: comp
Lines: 10

In article <20180@well.sf.ca.us>, feustel@well.sf.ca.us (David Alan Feustel) writes:
> iMy reason for mentioning the Smalltalk problem was not to fault
> Smalltalk but rather to point out that the 1.2 emulation mode in OS/2
> v 2.0 is not yet complete. No doubt other programs that work with OS/2
> v 1.2 but fail when run with 2.0 will come to light if the emulation
> is not improved.
	My understanding of the problem was that the rules for OS/2
	development and interface into the OS had some ambiguities in 
	them and that they only manifested themselves when the applications
	had to also run under 2.0.