Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.iso:1237 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:13049 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!swbull!love From: love@swbull.bull.se (Love Feuer) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: SLIP over X.25 Message-ID: <1990Sep19.112128.2154@swbull.bull.se> Date: 19 Sep 90 11:21:28 GMT References: <1990Sep18.143414.4441@hq.demos.su> Organization: Bull AB. Lines: 43 dvv@hq.demos.su (Dmitry V. Volodin) writes: >Have anybody tried this weird combination? Yup. We have a running TCP/IP link between Norway and Sweden on two Bull DPX 2/320's. It is not a point-to-point link, but a simulated multi- node network. Bull's own little unix (B.O.S) supports TCP/IP over X.25 with extensions to some existing commands. This is the way we did it: (Simplified) Both machines has the following entries in their /etc/hosts: swbull_ix0 125.0.0.1 medoc_ix0 125.0.0.2 swbull> ifconfig ix0 swbull_ix0 publix x121 swbull> route xadd bull_ix0 swbull> route xadd medoc_ix0 medoc> ifconfig ix0 medoc_ix0 public x121 medoc> route xadd bull_ix0 medoc> route xadd medoc_ix0 If we would want to connect more machines to the same network, we would simply add some more hosts with 'route xadd'. It works rather Ok, but it is *SLOW* due to the 2400 BPS modem on medoc's side. We will soon upgrade to 9600 on medoc and that will probably help the performance a bit. B.O.S. does not support UDP/IP over X.25. The reason for this is probably that nobody should get the very, very sick idea of running NFS over X.25. Mail me if you want the more pervert details of this installation. >------------------------------------+------------------------------ >Dmitry V. Volodin | >internet: | > or | Motto coming soon. Love Feuer Bull Sweden +46-8-7284349 Mail: love@swbull.bull.se -or- {anything major}!sunic!swbull!love