Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!usenix!jsq From: karl@IMA.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: in XPG3 Message-ID: <517@usenix.ORG> Date: 14 Sep 90 04:26:39 GMT Sender: jsq@usenix.ORG Reply-To: karl@IMA.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer) Organization: Interactive Systems, Cambridge, MA 02138-5302 Lines: 11 Approved: jsq@usenix.org (Moderator, John Quarterman) X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net Submitted-by: karl@IMA.ISC.COM (Karl Heuer) It seems that X/Open requires the implementation to provide a log-gamma function in the math library, using *both* names `gamma()' and `lgamma()', with identical semantics. What on earth is the point? Why didn't they just pick one of them as the standard name, and let the other faction convert their code? Karl W. Z. Heuer (karl@kelp.ima.isc.com or ima!kelp!karl), The Walking Lint Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 108