Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!myrias!ami-cg!cg From: cg@ami-cg.UUCP (Chris Gray) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Draco & Empire 2.1w Message-ID: <03136.AA03136@ami-cg.UUCP> Date: 14 Sep 90 17:25:04 GMT Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga Lines: 36 In (Ernest Gainey & David Tyler) write: > Anyways, I can't get his source to compile with Draco v1.2. > What I get is a compiler consistency check #5. > (also, the includes for draco 1.2 seem partly incomplete... > might just have been a slip on Chris Grays part..) consistency check #5 is down in my docs as: 5 - NextRegStack = &RegStack[0] in needRegs which is of course no use to you at all :-). I would suggest using fewer register variables in the procedure it is having trouble with, or simplifying the expression in the indicated source line. Also, are you running with a large enough stack? I use 25000. Oh yes, if you were getting error messages before the concheck, fix them first - some error conditions can mess up the register useage information - I started trying to fix all that cropped up, but it would have bloated the compiler. I find this quite odd - what is Dave compiling with? I don't believe I've sent him (or anyone!) my V1.3 compiler (which I just tried and it compiled Dave's V2.2w sources fine), so unless he is using an older version of the compiler, he is using the same version you have. What is missing in the V1.2 Draco includes? If you are referring to stuff that is new with V1.3 or V2.0, then I can understand - I don't even have the C versions of those yet (should have soon though - I ordered the Lattice 5.10 update). My machine is still running with lowly V1.2 ROMS. (Gee, all these version numbers are confusing!) -- -- Chris Gray usenet: {myrias.com,uunet.uu.net!myrias,alberta!myrias}!ami-cg!cg CIS: 74007,1165