Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!hercules!sparkyfs!usasoc.soc.mil!aero!aerospace.aero.org!huebner From: huebner@aerospace.aero.org (Robert E. Huebner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: HAM-E Message-ID: <85850@aerospace.AERO.ORG> Date: 17 Sep 90 23:02:13 GMT References: Sender: news@aerospace.aero.org Reply-To: huebner@sunpoison.UUCP (Robert E. Huebner) Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA Lines: 24 In article chris@genly.UUCP (Chris Hind Genly) writes: >I'm posting this for Ben Williams of Black Belt Systems. He doesn't >have direct access to USENET. I'd be glad to forward replies. [A whole lot of good, solid information deleted] >Some of you can see this thing easily - and compare >--------------------------------------------------- >We'll be at the Anahiem AmiExpo, in the booth right next to the DCTV >people, and we'd be quite pleased to show you our device where you can >look at ours, and theirs just by turning your head. Could somebody please post a date for this. I'm sure its in one of the magazines, but I don't have access to them at the moment. Also, I was glad to see such a authoritative response on the video issue, but the tone the article took was a little distressing. DCTV and HAM-E are both much needed, much appreciated products entering the Amiga market at a time when they are greatly needed. However, I don't see the advantage in flaming a competetors product on the 'net. A direct comparison chart or somesuch is great, but sarcastic comments we can do without. +---- Robert Huebner huebner@aerospace.aero.org @en.ecn.purdue.edu The Aerospace Corporation Purdue University +----