Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucdavis!csusac!csuchico.edu!mrush
From: mrush@csuchico.edu (Matt "C P." Rush)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Shared Interrupts
Keywords: "not supported" interrupts
Message-ID: <1990Sep15.011910.704@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: 15 Sep 90 01:19:10 GMT
References: <28208@swrinde.nde.swri.edu> <14444@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (USENET)
Reply-To: mrush@cscihp.UUCP
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 28

In article <14444@cbmvax.commodore.com> daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) writes:
>
>The interrupts are level-sensitive (except for level 7, NMI, which isn't 
>supported in the A2000).  This means that, as long as interrupts are enabled
>(both in the Amiga interrupt controller and 680x0 sense), the 680x0 CPU will
>sample the interrupt code every so often and dispatch the appropriate 
>interrupt service vector as long as an interrupt is held low.

	What does that mean that level 7, NMI, interrupts aren't supported in
the A2000?  Is that to say that it is impossible for anything to assert a level
7 interrupt, or that if anything does it will be ignored?

>-- 
>Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Amiga 3000) "The Crew That Never Rests"
>   {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh      PLINK: hazy     BIX: hazy
>      Get that coffee outta my face, put a Margarita in its place!

	There's a Margarita waiting for ya any time you find yourself in Chico!

	-- Matt

    *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
    %    The Chico branch of the "Anything    %  mrush@csuchico.edu      %
    %    Associated with Amiga" Fan Club.     %  mrush@cscihp.UUCP       %
    %                                                                    %
    %                              Now:  mrush@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu  %
    *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
     This is a SCHOOL!  Do you think they even CARE about MY opinions?!