Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!adm!lhc!mimsy!mojo!russotto
From: russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: A low blow from Apple
Message-ID: <1990Sep14.163547.24596@eng.umd.edu>
Date: 14 Sep 90 16:35:47 GMT
References: <4395@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (The News System)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Lines: 18

In article <4395@crash.cts.com> mikeu@pro-magic.cts.com (Mike Ungerman) writes:
>In-Reply-To: message from mattd@Apple.COM
>
>If Apple offered a compact, ][ based, computer with the same capabilities and
>mass storage that a typical 286/386 Hard Drive based machine offered, I'd
>recommed it, but you don't.  As a developer, if you don't develop and market a
>competitive product you are out of the market, and right now, you are right
>out of the market with the Apple ][GS unless someone knows what he wants from
>the start.

And what processor would this machine be based on?  Would it be less expensive
or more expensive than that OTHER line of Apple computer that I'm not going
to mention.

(Hint-- R&D to invent the processor is expensive)
--
Matthew T. Russotto	russotto@eng.umd.edu	russotto@wam.umd.edu
      .sig under construction, like the rest of this campus.