Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!world!decwrl!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!canisius!pavlov From: pavlov@canisius.UUCP (Greg Pavlov) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec Subject: Re: SCSI disks on a MicroVAX 2000 Message-ID: <2874@canisius.UUCP> Date: 18 Sep 90 17:05:42 GMT References: <1712.26ef97e1@hamavnet.com> <1669@shodha.enet.dec.com> <7716@sunquest.UUCP> Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo N.Y. 14208 Lines: 17 In article <7716@sunquest.UUCP>, gavron@alpha.sunquest.com (Ehud Gavron) writes: > In article <1669@shodha.enet.dec.com>, alan@shodha.enet.dec.com ( Alan's Home for Wayward Notes File.) writes... > # > # # controller> > > Gosh, and how surprising that this opinion comes from someone > who works for DEC... In this case, I would take the advice seriously. The TK50 was not designed to be a universally compatible SCSI device. And more than one third-party combination of SCSI interface, SCSI disk, and SCSI tape has failed to work. Sometimes, the SCSI "standard" seems to have more in common with RS-232 than it should.... greg pavlov, fstrf, amherst, ny