Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!mephisto!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!newcastle.ac.uk!turing!ncrr
From: ncrr@turing.newcastle.ac.uk (Chris Ritson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore
Subject: Re: buglists etc.
Message-ID: <1990Sep20.090618.15829@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: 20 Sep 90 09:06:18 GMT
References: <jdarcy.653758452@zelig>
Sender: news@newcastle.ac.uk
Organization: Computing Laboratory, U of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU.
Lines: 12

In article <jdarcy.653758452@zelig>, jdarcy@encore.com (Jeff d'Arcy) writes:
>People have suggested that we should publish a
>bug list, and I've objected based on the inevitable "scariness" of some
>OS bugs.  How would people feel if Encore were to distribute a version of
>the buglist, *knowing* that some of the scarier items had been omitted?
>Would that be a sufficient demonstration of good faith?

I would like to see a full bug list. If need be it could be on paper, marked
confidential, and I would see that it went only to a selected list of staff
and was then either locked up or shredded if you wish.

Chris Ritson (C.R.Ritson@newcastle.ac.uk)