Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc01!hpcuhb!hpindda!rajs
From: rajs@hpindda.cup.hp.com (Rajeev Seth)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 1024x768 monitors:  Decided on a big one
Message-ID: <51370002@hpindda.cup.hp.com>
Date: 13 Sep 90 01:37:38 GMT
References: <19711@ttidca.TTI.COM>
Lines: 20

/ hpindda:comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware / terence@ttidca.TTI.COM (Terence Davis) /  3:20 pm  Sep 10, 1990 /

About a week ago I posted a summary of my requests for 1024x768 monitors
and boards (and some other stuff).  I had not yet decided on a monitor
to match my NEC Graphics Engine.  Now, after seeing my office-mate running
1024x768 Windows 3.0 and its requisite fonts which are small even on his
20" monitor, I've decided I really will need a larger (16"+) monitor.
So, what I'm interested in is a 16" (or larger) monitor that will handle
at least 1024x768 non-interlaced images, not cost a fortune and hopefully
meet FCC class B requirements (I'll be using it exclusively at home).
I heard that the Nano 16" monitor is good and someone mentioned Mitsubishi
monitors:  any more info on them?  Also, how about the Seiko monitors?
Any and all information will be appreciated.

Please send to me at terence@ttidca.tti.com

Thanks,

Terry
----------