Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!gvgpsa!gold!grege From: grege@gold.GVG.TEK.COM (Greg Ebert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: What (exactly) are MFM and RLL Modulation Techniques? Message-ID: <1456@gold.GVG.TEK.COM> Date: 14 Sep 90 16:53:32 GMT References: <4304@trantor.harris-atd.com> <1453@gold.GVG.TEK.COM> <4313@trantor.harris-atd.com> Distribution: na Organization: Grass Valley Group, Grass Valley, CA Lines: 36 [This response also addresses another question about 'non-RLL' drives] First of all, I goofed in my original posting. 'RLL' is actually "2,7 RLL" which means that the minimum spacing is 2 zeros, and the maximum is 7 zeros. I should have examined the patterns more closely because I stated IBM had a maximum spacing of 8, and XEROX 6. They actually are both 7. I believe the reason there are RLL drives is because the read-data timing (also known as drive-margin) needs to be tighter for RLL than MFM because there is a higher probability that a PLL will fall 'out-of-sync' when the spacing between adjacent 1's is 7 zeros. For comparison, the maximum gap between adjacent 1's in MFM corresponds to a run of only 5 zeros in RLL. The design of phase-locked loops (PLL's) is an art in itself. The PLL has a profound effect on data reliability, but there are limits to it's capabilities. Thus, an effort is made by the drive manufacturer to build a drive with a better drive-margin. Factors such as spindle-speed variation, signal-to-noise ratio, and write current contribute to bit shift. However, I would feel comfortable using RLL formatting on an 'MFM-only' drive if I had an error-correcting controller. > >P.S. I do not yet understand why this stuff is called Frequency Modulation. > Do you? > Nope. My guess is that its sloppy nomenclature, just like calling DOS an operating system (HA!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ##### {uunet!tektronix!gold!grege} "Register to vote, then ## | ## grege@gold.gvg.tek.com vote responsibly" # | # # /|\ # "Support the First Amendment, not those who attack it" #/ | \# #######