Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!lb7
From: LB7@psuvm.psu.edu (Lorinda L. Brader)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: Re: PC HyperCard clones
Message-ID: <90257.101104LB7@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: 14 Sep 90 14:11:04 GMT
References: <1990Sep12.143927.7489@infonode.ingr.com>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 14

In article <1990Sep12.143927.7489@infonode.ingr.com>, lowersbp@infonode.ingr.com
(Ben P Lowers) says:
>
>It doesn't sound near
>as bad as the reports we getting about how BAD ToolBook is.

Although ToolBook is considerably slower, in general the features of ToolBook
blow HyperCard 1.2 right out of the water!  However, HyperCard 2.0 and ToolBook
are very similar.  There are some features of ToolBook that are better than
HyperCard 2.0 and some that are not as good as those in HyperCard 2.0.  (One
that is worse is speed of execution.)

Overall the concepts and functionality of HyperCard 2.0 and ToolBook are very
similar.