Xref: utzoo comp.terminals:2293 misc.wanted:11282
Newsgroups: comp.terminals,misc.wanted
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!rbutterworth
From: rbutterworth@watmath.waterloo.edu (Ray Butterworth)
Subject: Re: termcap needed for Visual 100
Message-ID: <1990Sep20.180251.14147@watmath.waterloo.edu>
Organization: Math Faculty Computing Facility, University of Waterloo
References: <1990Sep20.025140.20462@NCoast.ORG>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 90 18:02:51 GMT
Lines: 11

In article <1990Sep20.025140.20462@NCoast.ORG> smith@NCoast.ORG (Phil Smith) writes:
>The subject covers it, if you happen to have
>a termcap entry for a Visual 100 laying around,
>I could use it. Save me the hassle of hacking up my own.

The Visual 100 I used a few years back was the best clone of at vt100
I've ever seen.  It behaved like a vt100 and did nothing extra and
wouldn't emulate anything else.  Rather a refreshing concept when
everything else that emulates a vt100 also tends to go into snits
when you send strange escape sequences that a real vt100 would ignore.
i.e. :tc=vt100: should be the only capability you need define.