Xref: utzoo news.admin:10617 news.groups:23760 comp.unix.internals:263
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mlb.semi.harris.com!thrush.mlb.semi.harris.com!del
From: del@thrush.mlb.semi.harris.com (Don Lewis)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups,comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: c.u.wizards vs. c.u.internals
Message-ID: <1990Sep14.010840.26683@mlb.semi.harris.com>
Date: 14 Sep 90 01:08:40 GMT
References: <3370@stl.stc.co.uk> <1857@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca> <450@oha.UUCP>
Sender: news@mlb.semi.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne FL
Lines: 15

In article <450@oha.UUCP> tony@oha.UUCP (Tony Olekshy) writes:
>I think the smart thing to do at this time is to undo the c.u.w rmgroup and
>let this thing ride for the rest of the year.  It's just possible that the
>new c.u.* groups will soak up much of the stuff that was overloading c.u.w. 
>Internals is a valid but separate topic from wizards anyway.  Can't I be
>a unix wizard on an externals topic?

I've been thinking about unaliasing c.u.wizards here.  It seems to me
that c.u.wizards - (c.u.admin + c.u.internals + c.u.programmer) is probably
just noise, so I could unsubscribe to c.u.wizards and increase the
signal to noise ratio of what I read.
--
Don "Truck" Lewis                      Harris Semiconductor
Internet:  del@mlb.semi.harris.com     PO Box 883   MS 62A-028
Phone:     (407) 729-5205              Melbourne, FL  32901