Xref: utzoo alt.security:1565 alt.bbs:2959 comp.unix.sysv386:463 Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!ucdavis!csusac!csuchico.edu!atman From: atman@csuchico.edu (Homeless hacker) Newsgroups: alt.security,alt.bbs,comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Protecting against downloads Message-ID: <1990Sep17.235708.16065@ecst.csuchico.edu> Date: 17 Sep 90 23:57:08 GMT References: <8RFgP2w163w@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <2441@sud509.ed.ray.com> Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (USENET) Reply-To: atman@cscihp.UUCP (Homeless hacker) Organization: California State University, Chico Lines: 15 In article <2441@sud509.ed.ray.com> heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com writes: >What's a "public access unix" without shell access? I want to provide >access for all of the reasons you mentioned here. If I wanted to >continue to ONLY allow access via a menu-driven program, I'd have no >reason to switch from my current dos bbs. What about all those neat (multiuser) games available for Unix that won't run under dos? Cf Empire, conquer, mazewar, etc? Or have these been translated to run under Desqview or some other similar multi-tasker? (Not to mention wumpus and fortune! :-) ) -- ------ reply to atman%csuchico.EDU@RELAY.CS.NET or one of these others: Fidonet : atman via 1:119/666.0 WWIVnet : 1@9651