Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!apple!olivea!orc!inews!iwarp.intel.com!gargoyle!igloo!ddsw1!obdient!vpnet!cgordon
From: cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Gordon Hlavenka)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: comm conflicts in enhanced mode
Message-ID: <26f14726-45f.7comp.windows.ms-1@vpnet.chi.il.us>
Date: 14 Sep 90 21:55:03 GMT
References: <1990Sep7.013045.13691@amd.com> <1990Sep12.193251.1741@amd.com>
Lines: 16


>Author: [Bryon Lape]
>	Very simple, get the shareware version of Procomm.  It works in

>Author: [Phil Ngai]
>I tried writing script files with the commercial version of procomm.
>It sucks the big one. What a waste of money. Procomm scripts stink.

Now, now.  Byron has suggested the _shareware_ ProComm, and Phil is
complaining about the _commercial_ version.  These are two very different
products, with one of the main differences being a much more [complex]
[robust] script language in the commercial version.  I tried the "test
drive" commercial product, and went directly back to the shareware.

-----------------------------------------------------
Gordon S. Hlavenka            cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us
Disclaimer:                Yeah, I said it.  So what?