Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!chakra!price From: price@chakra.unl.edu (Chad Price) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Windows 3 - caveat emptor Message-ID: Date: 17 Sep 90 02:23:53 GMT References: <1990Sep13.021413.28670@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer) Organization: University of Nebraska, Computing Resource Center Lines: 22 In <1990Sep13.021413.28670@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rb9a@watt.acc.Virginia.EDU (Raul Baragiola) writes: >After having used Win3 for a few months, I find that some things should be >said, specially considering all the one-sided support that I noticed in >Byte and PC Magazine. . . >8) Having said all that, I must confess that similar arguments should keep >anyone away from Unix or similar systems which are equally or more compli- >cated. Do you mean to tell me that you get good support on DOS (the operating system) ?? Having used CP/M, DOS 2.0-3.3, primos, unix (bsd, ultrix, Sys V), and bits and pieces of others like CTOS (COnvergent Tech), MVS, etc. I find that in general, when it comes to system software you are on your own. Groups like this are one of the best ways I know of to get information on how to do it. Chad Price price@fergvax.unl.edu PS This is not a flame - it is a comment/query.