Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!smoke.cs.toronto.edu!neat.cs.toronto.edu!moraes Newsgroups: comp.windows.x From: moraes@cs.toronto.edu (Mark Moraes) Subject: ghostscript2.0 (was Re: fix to font cacheing in ralpage postscript viewer) Message-ID: <90Sep14.020654edt.2178@smoke.cs.toronto.edu> Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto References: <1990Aug21.002853.14831@sics.se> <26192@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 14 Sep 90 06:08:12 GMT Lines: 66 grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu (Dirk Grunwald) writes: >how does 'ralpage' compare to ghostscript 2.0 (available on prep.ai.mit.edu). gs2.0 was able to preview some things that ralpage didn't. (dvi2ps output, including the psfig/TeX manual), and MacDraw output. gs2.0 croaked a few pages into the psfig/troff manual (output of transcript2.1 psdit), but ralpage was so slow on the images on the first page, I gave up on it. gs2.0 doesn't like something in the starlines example (possibly the fact that I don't have the fonts installed -- using ugly_r.gsf only) On some things, gs2.0 is much faster. It generally seems to use less CPU time, but sometimes seems to use more real time, perhaps because it's doing things that the X server does more slowly? Some timings on an SGI 4D/240 driving a 3/50 display (an R4 server, compiled with gcc): mooreform.ps: gs: real 36.7 user 3.3 sys 1.2 ralpage: real 1:05.4 user 17.6 sys 3.2 raygun2 gs: real 55.4 user 2.7 sys 1.7 ralpage: real 59.4 user 4.2 sys 2.0 a manual page, formatted with ditroff/transcript2.1 gs: real 16.3 user 1.2 sys 0.5 ralpage: real 9.1 user 3.7 sys 1.4 All in all, this release of Ghostscript is an amazing improvement over the last version. Mark.